Remarks on grammaticalization,text a~d theories of change

Susan Wright

Abstract


These remarks concern a theory of change which has one particular change-type at its centre: grammaticalization. This concept is defined by Meillet (1912:131) as ~le passage d'un mot autonome au role d'element grammatical". The definition's very breadth has led to the incorporation of "grammaticalization" into various theories of syntactic change in different guises. Contrast, for instance, the catastrophic character that Lightfoot (1979) attributes to this type of change as category change, with the regulatory role assigned to it by Givan (1979:ch. 5) in his attempt to justify the hypothesis that certain types of diachronic change embody a "syntacticizationl ' process. Note too, its functional role in Traugott's (1980) theory of grammaticalization chains as semantic-pragmatic shifts, and its specific manifestation as category change by lexical and speaker-to-speaker diffusion in Romaine's (1981) socia-historical linguistics.

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5774/15-0-97

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c)




ISSN 2223-9936 (online); ISSN 1027-3417 (print)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License


Powered by OJS and hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2011.


Disclaimer:

This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.

SUNJournals Help