Root transformations as a waste-basket forpotential counter-examples to the Structure-Preserving Constraint
Abstract
Generative grammarians have often claimed that transformational generative grammar does have the status of an empirical science. l ) Botha (1978, p.30) points out that this claim is problematic in more than one sense. He (1978, p.30) formulates one of the problems that arises in connection with this claim as follows:
Issue
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
