Neo-Darwinian accounts of the evolution of language: 1. Questions about their explanatory focus
Abstract
The neo-Darwinian theory of natural selection, it is generally considered, offers the only adequate conceptual framework for explaining the evolution of complex biological structures. 1 On various recent conceptions of language, moreover, human language is to be taken to be just such a biological structure.2 So it is not really surprising that an increasing volume of work is aimed at constructing nea-Darwinian selectionist accounts of the evolution of language in the human species.3 And, indeed, engaging in this work is potentially profitable in at least two broad ways. It could, for one thing, lead to a better understanding of the beginnings of language, a matter that has baffled scholars for centuries. For another, it could yield important new insights into a range of nonevolutionary aspects of language. Thus, it has become increasingly clear that, in order to develop good selectionist accounts of the evolution of language, a better understanding is required of amongst others:
Issue
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
